Questions, answered

Automation runs a fixed sequence you designed. A fleet is given an objective and the judgement to handle the cases you did not anticipate — and it escalates to a person when it should not decide alone.

The agents are the same; the brief is not. A founder fleet is pointed at shipping an MVP and validating demand. An enterprise fleet is pointed at multi-tenant scale, ticketing integration, and regional pipeline. You pick the segment and the roster reconfigures.

You describe the concept, we scope it into agent briefs, and the fleet starts read-only against the systems it needs. Most teams reach their first reviewable output inside two weeks.

No. Scoping is done with whoever owns the process. Engineering is only involved when an agent needs access to a system that has no standard integration.

A first fleet is usually running against live work inside a fortnight. Anything longer than that is a sign the brief was scoped too broadly.

Pilots are priced per fleet, not per seat, and agreed before scoping starts. You are buying a defined piece of work with a scorecard attached, not a licence.

No. Agents work inside the systems you already run. If a tool has no standard integration we will say so during scoping rather than after.

You keep the scoping document and the audit trail, and we stop. A fleet that cannot be measured is a fleet we should not have deployed, and that is our call to get right up front.

Each agent ships with an execution scorecard agreed up front. You review it the way you would review a hire: against the outcomes you asked for.

It escalates rather than guesses. You choose the confidence threshold below which work is handed to a person, per agent.

Yes. Access can be revoked from one place at any time, and every action is logged, so you can see exactly what was done before you stopped it.

Early on, a daily review of the output queue. Once the scorecards are stable, most teams move to a weekly review.

Agents are configured against your steps, so a process change is a configuration change. Nothing is hardcoded into a bespoke build.

Yes, within the permissions its brief has been granted. Each system is scoped separately, so widening one does not quietly widen the rest.

Through the same queues a person would use. One agent finishing does not silently trigger another — the handoff is a step you can see and stop.

Work stops at the last completed step and is retried rather than half-applied. The audit trail shows where it paused and what had already been written.

Only what its brief requires, granted per system and reviewable at any time. Most agents start read-only and gain write access after the pilot.

Every action an agent takes is recorded with its inputs and the decision that produced it, so any output can be traced back to its reasoning.

In the region you nominate. Data residency is set per workspace and does not change without your say-so.

Yes, where your provider supports it. The agent brief and the scorecard are independent of which model executes the work.

Every agent's permissions are listed in one place with the date they were granted, so an access review is a report rather than an investigation.

Yes. Terms are agreed before any access is granted, and the agreement names the systems and the retention period for that engagement.

For the period set in your agreement, after which logs and any cached content are deleted. Retention is set per workspace, not globally.

We will walk your security team through the access model, the audit trail, and our current posture during scoping, and answer questionnaires in writing.